There have been many fad-like interventions for children with autism that have had little or no tangible results or in some cases caused harm (Smith, 2006; Association for Science in Autism Treatment, www.asatonline.org). It's understandable that insurance companies, school districts, and other government agencies that are governed by requirements to provide only evidence-based treatments are hesitant to provide benefits for specific interventions. However, the evidence supporting intensive behavioral treatment has grown to a level that is all but overwhelming. Numerous reviews of the quantity and quality of research on interventions for children with autism demonstrate the Lovaas Model of Early Intensive Behavioral Intervention to be "well established" based upon objective criteria for evaluating educational and social science research (Eikeseth, 2009; Rogers & Vismara, 2008, Odom et al., 2009).